[返回博论天下首页]·[所有跟帖]·[ 回复本帖 ] ·[热门原创] ·[繁體閱讀]·[版主管理]
在手机测试上全面作弊的华为无赖行为
送交者: yg28[☆品衔R4☆] 于 2020-01-05 16:53 已读 1811 次  

yg28的个人频道

如何评价华为跑分作弊的传统艺能最近又被Geekbench发现了? (原文:https://pincong.rocks/question/14738) 6park.com

根据Geekbench列出了跑分作弊名单,Huawei Mate 30 Pro 5G赫然在列:
https://browser.geekbench.com/mobile-benchmarks
(Excluded Devices在该网页的底部)

The devices listed below are excluded from the benchmark chart. These devices run Geekbench (and possibly other benchmarks) in an artificial benchmark mode. Other applications do not run in this benchmark mode, which leads to benchmark results that do not correspond to real-world performance. 6park.com

在这之前(2018年9月),Geekbench引述了Anandtech关于华为操纵手机性能跑分的情况:
https://www.geekbench.com/blog/2018/09/huawei-benchmark-boost/ 6park.com

Primate Labs will exclude the following Huawei phones from the Android Benchmark Chart and the Mobile Benchmark Chart, and will add an alert to individual results for the following Huawei phones that the phones attempt to manipulate benchmark results: 6park.com

Huawei P20Huawei P20 ProHuawei Mate 10Huawei Mate 10 Pro
https://www.anandtech.com/show/13318/huawei-benchmark-cheating-headache 6park.com

As part of our phone comparison analysis, we often employ additional power and performance testing on our benchmarks. While testing out the new phones, the Honor Play had some odd results. Compared to the Huawei P20 devices tested earlier in the year, which have the same SoC, the results were also quite a bit worse and equally weird. 6park.com

Within our P20 review, we had noted that the P20’s performance had regressed compared to the Mate 10. Since we had encountered similar issues on the Mate 10 which were resolved with a firmware update pushed to me, we didn’t dwell too much on the topic and concentrated on other parts of the review. 6park.com

Looking back at it now after some re-testing, it seems quite blatant as to what Huawei and seemingly Honor had been doing: the newer devices come with a benchmark detection mechanism that enables a much higher power limit for the SoC with far more generous thermal headroom. Ultimately, on certain whitelisted applications, the device performs super high compared to what a user might expect from other similar non-whitelisted titles. This consumes power, pushes the efficiency of the unit down, and reduces battery life. 6park.com

This has knock-on effects, such as trust, in how the device works. The end result is a single performance number is higher, which is good for marketing, but is unrealistic to any user with the device. The efficiency of the SoC also decreases (depending on the chip), as the chip is pushed well outside its standard operating window. It makes the SoC, one of the differentiating points of the device, look worse, all for the sake of a high benchmark score. Here's the example of benchmark detection mode on and off on the Honor Play:
喜欢yg28朋友的这个贴子的话, 请点这里投票,“赞”助支持!
[举报反馈]·[ yg28的个人频道 ]·[-->>参与评论回复]·[用户前期主贴]·[手机扫描浏览分享]·[返回博论天下首页]
帖子内容是网友自行贴上分享,如果您认为其中内容违规或者侵犯了您的权益,请与我们联系,我们核实后会第一时间删除。

所有跟帖:        ( 主贴楼主有权删除不文明回复,拉黑不受欢迎的用户 )


用户名:密码:[--注册ID--]

标 题:

粗体 斜体 下划线 居中 插入图片插入图片 插入Flash插入Flash动画


     图片上传  Youtube代码器  预览辅助

手机扫描进入,浏览分享更畅快!

楼主本栏目热帖推荐:

>>>>查看更多楼主社区动态...






[ 留园条例 ] [ 广告服务 ] [ 联系我们 ] [ 个人帐户 ] [ 版主申请 ] [ Contact us ]