| 送交者: compact[★品衔R5★] 于 2020-03-01 12:13 已读 3279 次 4 赞 | compact的个人频道 |
“5.3.3 Sample Collection Personnel shall have official documentation,
https://www.wada-ama.org/sites/default/files/resources/files/isti_2019_redline_en.pdf
provided by the Sample Collection Authority, evidencing their authority to
collect a Sample from the Athlete, such as an authorisation letter from the
Testing Authority. DCOs shall also carry complementary identification which
includes their name and photograph (i.e., identification card from the Sample
Collection Authority, driver’s licence, health card, passport or similar valid
identification) and the expiry date of the identification.” 6park.com
这里对SCP有明确的要求，大致翻译如下
“SCP应当持有SCA提供的官方文件，比如TA的授权信函，说明他（他）有从运动员提取样品的权利” 6park.com对DCO的要求是 6park.com“DCO应当持有补充身份文件，包括（所有）检验人员的姓名和照片（比如SCA提供的证件，他们的驾照，健保卡，护照或其
他有效证件）以及证件的终止日期” 6park.com 6park.com 6park.com
对Sample Collection Authority的定义在第25页，如下： 6park.com"Sample Collection Authority: The organisation that is responsible for the
collection of Samples in compliance with the requirements of the International
Standard for Testing and Investigations, whether (1) the Testing Authority
itself; or (2) another organization (for example, a third party contractor) to
whom the Testing Authority has delegated or sub- contracted such responsibility
(provided that the Testing Authority always remains ultimately responsible
under the Code for compliance with the requirements of the International
Standard for Testing and Investigations relating to collection of Samples)." 6park.com上述定义明确表明，它不是平常的血检、尿检的机构，要么是TA自己，要么有TA的正式授权。这里用的是"delegated or sub-contracted"。 6park.com从这里看，孙杨应该处于很有利的地位，不明白为什么会输。 6park.com而且，从先后次序上看，五个人都已签字证明这次取检无效，那么检样还不属于WADA的财产，孙杨有处理的权利。 如果这个逻辑成立，如何处理就是irrelevant了。 6park.comFYI：我不是任何人的粉丝，只是纯粹想自己研究明白。评分完成：已经给本帖加上 30 银元！
评分完成：已经给 compact 加上 200 银元！
请点这里投票，“赞”助支持！