最近，一位美国少年在校发言的视频在社交媒体上引发关注。 6park.com
在这段视频中，一名学生在学校的校董会上发言，讲述自己的祖母因为感染新冠不幸去世，呼吁在校师生佩戴口罩，严格遵守防疫措施，然而他的发言却被在座反对戴口罩的人群所嘲笑打断……



Video has emerged showing people laughing at a student as he talks about the death of his grandmother from COVID-19 at a Tennessee school board meeting to discuss whether to impose a mask mandate. 6park.com
The clip, which has been shared on social media, shows a boy from Rutherford County explaining why he believes that masks should be worn on school premises to help protect people from COVID-19. 6park.com
据美国《新闻周刊》杂志 (Newsweek)报道，视频中，男孩说道：“如果我感染了新冠，我会传染给家人，而我也常常和祖父母谈论这件事。他们比我感染的风险要高，我不希望他们感染新冠。” 6park.com
而就在去年的这个时候，曾是该校老师的男孩祖母，因为人们不佩戴口罩，感染新冠去世。



"If I get COVID, I'm going to bring it to my family and I talk to my grandparents a lot," the student said. "They're higher risk than me. So I don't want to give them COVID. 6park.com
"This time last year, my grandmother, who was a former teacher at the Rutherford County school system, died of COVID because someone wasn't wearing a mask." 6park.com
就在他说到这段失去至亲的经历时，只见他身后的女子摇了摇头，笑了出来。



The comment resulted in a number of people laughing and expressing their disagreement. 6park.com
The clip shows two women sitting behind the student holding "Let our kids smile" placards. They are smirking and shaking their heads as he tries to continue. 6park.com
他的发言也被在座一些人的嘲笑声所打断，后来在现场工作人员的组织下，他的发言才得以继续。



在发言最后，他表示：“这是一个可以避免的问题，在学校内不戴口罩是不负责任的行为。我们在杀人。这不是教育应该教会我们学生的事情。” 6park.com
"This is an avoidable issue and by not wearing masks in schools, it's irresponsible," the student adds. "We're killing people. This is not something that we should be doing for the education of our students." 6park.com
不少外国网友都对现场观众的反应感到不齿↓


“这太可怕了。我不敢相信大家是如此的无礼”


“我差点吐了”


“太恶心了”


“可悲啊！！！”

据报道，这场于9月7日召开的校董会旨在决定学生是否应在校内戴口罩，或者遵从学生家长的选择。而在三个多小时的辩论后，校董会认为在进行投票之前，应该就这一问题进行更多调研。 6park.com
The Rutherford County School Board meeting on September 7 was aiming to determine if students should be made to wear masks in school, or if it should be the parents' choice. 6park.com
After more than three hours of debate, the board ruled that more research was needed before a vote.