奥黑任命的不合格法官应该解雇掉

                昨天，有报道“美国一名联邦法官无限期阻止解散美国国际开发署，称单方面关闭美国国际开发署的行为可能违反美国宪法。”这是啥狗屁不通的判决？你要不确定到底违不违反宪法，去找个懂宪法的法官问清楚再判决啊。呃，等等，法官可以不懂宪法吗？这种法官难道不该解雇？
鉴于中文报道可能翻译错误，我特意找了英文报道，发现是这么写的。
A federal judge has rebuked Elon Musk and his Department of Government Efficiency for their efforts to dismantle the U.S. Agency for International Development, declaring that Musk’s effort to erase the agency likely violated the Constitution in “multiple ways.”
The effort was likely illegal for two reasons, the judge wrote. First, it appeared to violate the Constitution’s “appointments clause,” which says that government officials wielding significant power must be appointed by the president — and confirmed by the Senate — to offices established by Congress. Musk has not gone through that process. Second, the judge wrote, DOGE’s bid to effectively eliminate USAID appeared to violate laws passed by Congress that dictate the agency’s functions.
OK，首先，中文媒体没翻译错，说的确实是likely violated the Constitution，甚至还强调in “multiple ways”。不过报道里我就看到了一条， appeared to violate the Constitution’s “appointments clause”。完整判决在这
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.mdd.576293/gov.uscourts.mdd.576293.73.0.pdf
有68页，我是没耐心看的，如果有人看出了更多违反宪法的地方，欢迎回复指出。
其次，appointments clause说了啥呢？有没有这么高深难懂？我以前倒是写过一篇，吐槽美国宪法写的还不如产品说明书，但看了这条，发现这条还真不难懂。它说的是政府高官，应该由总统提名，参院批准。川普刚开始就有提名部长，参院不过的。法官指出，马斯克没有经参院批准，违宪！
我只能遗憾这法官水平太低了。宪法说的清清楚楚，government officials！马斯克和DOGE都不是政府雇员，不属于这条宪法的管辖范围，不存在违宪。要不然美国总统还会指定青年科学家这类获奖人，难道也要去参院批准一下？
这么低能的法官是谁？法官叫Theodore Chuang, an appointee of President Barack Obama。这些奥黑乱任命的法官应该通过考核，不合格的走人！


贴主:jolly11于2025_03_19 10:23:14编辑楼主设置：谢绝布衣用户参与回复交流