| 送交者: qa[★品衔R6★] 于 2018-10-03 19:21 已读 1088 次 | qa的个人频道 |
6park.comWhy are film actors so highly paid whereas scientists are paid relatively quite little? 6park.com 6park.com 6park.comStill have a question? Ask your own! 6park.com
What is your question? 6park.com 6park.com 6park.com 6park.com100+ ANSWERS 6park.com 6park.com 6park.com 6park.com 6park.com 6park.com6park.com 6park.comAnonymous 6park.com 6park.comAnswered Feb 20, 2015 · Upvoted by Fred Melamed, M.F.A. Acting, Yale School of Drama (1981) 6park.com 6park.com 6park.com 6park.comThis is a basic question about economics. It is similar to my daughter asking why professional dancers are paid so little, when they work so hard, while I'm in the top 1% economically, seeming to put in pretty modest effort. 6park.comWealthy scientists are practically invisible. They are usually wealthy because of inventions that are of economic value. 6park.comActors making buckets of money are relatively rare. Consider why they make buckets of money. What difference in box office for one of those actors. Could you imagine Iron Man 2 doing so well in the box office if they replaced RDJ? His presence is worth much more to the success of the movie than what he got paid. You can't really do a controlled experiment, but if the studios think he's worth an extra $100,000,000 in box office, paying him $50,000,000 is still worth it. 6park.comFilm studios perceive, I believe correctly, that there is a direct, measurable, economic benefit to having these A-List actors in their movies. As long as they think they are going to make more extra money than they are paying the actor, it's a good deal for them. 6park.com 6park.com 6park.com 6park.com评分完成：已经给 qa 加上 50 银元！
请点这里投票，“赞”助支持！