| 送交者: 敞开裤裆任风吹[★★声望品衔10★★] 于 2020-06-04 21:51 已读 129 次 | 敞开裤裆任风吹的个人频道 |
回答: 关于1967中印战争。。。 由 mik600 于 2020-06-04 20:36
I don’t assume Indian friends’ claims are wrong. 6park.comI will only provide PLA’s records of that skirmish so you can obtain information from both sides. 6park.comAll the information of wikipedia term—Nathu La and Cho La clashes - Wikipedia comes from Indian side. 6park.comSo the information from Chinese side?(not necessarily correct) 6park.comBelow is PLA’s record: 6park.comSource: 1967年中印边境冲突 6park.comThe first skirmish began on Sep/11th/1967. 6park.com7:30, Indian mountain infantry approached Chinese sentry outpost near Nathu La by a battalion of No.112 brigade, 110 men in total. 6park.comThe Chinese Army issued a serious warning. 6park.comAt 8:07, the Indian army first shot and threw a grenade, leading to Chinese commander, Li Yancheng’s death. 6 Chinese soldiers were injured. 6park.comPLA counterattacked immediately, using 40 rocket launcher . 6park.comIn 7 minutes, 67 Indian soldiers were killed. 7 Indian army fortifications were destroyed. 6park.comAt 8:15, the Indian army began to run back off the battlefield. PLA kept in place and did not chase Indian army. 6park.comThe seventeenth brigade of the Indian artillery began to bombard. 6park.comThen Chinese artillery No. 380 regiment used No.82 and No.120 mortars to fire back. 6park.comDuring the whole 4 days and 3 nights’ conflict, Indian army lost 8 artillery positons, 2 command post, 2 sentry post, 23 fortifications and 2 trucks due to Chinese artillery. 540 Indian solidiers were killed and wounded.(7 bodies were left in Chinese territory here.) 6park.comFinally, Indian artillery stopped firing at Sep 13, 22:00. 6park.comPLA stopped firing at 9/14, midday. 6park.comThe Second skirmish began on Oct/1st. 6park.comAt 11:20, 7 Indian soldiers crossed the border, conflicting against PLA soldiers with bodies but were pushed back to the India border. 6park.comIndian soldiers then began to shoot. One chinese soldier was killed and one was wounded. Then Chinese soldiers fired back. 7 Indian soldiers who crossed the border were killed. 6park.comThen India artillery started to bombard, using the 51mm and 81mm mortars. Chinese artillery bombarded back at 12:00, killing and wounding 195 Indian soldiers. 29 Indian fortifications were destroyed. 6park.comIndia artillery stopped firing at 19:55 and so did PLA stop firing. 6park.comFinal output: 6park.com607 Indian soldiers were killed or wounded. 6park.com123 chinese soldiers were killed or wounded. 6park.comPLA captured 1 light machine guns, 9 submachine guns and 16 rifles. 6park.comSep/16th, Indian side waved a white flag, asking to enter into Chinese territory. After signing up the delivering document, they took 14 bodies , 24 captured guns back. No Chinese soldier bodies and weapons were left in Indian side. 6park.comAgain, I emphasize that above is the record of PLA side. 6park.comI provided it only for people here able to obtain information from both sides. 6park.comWelcome to share your opinions :) 6park.comOriginal answer: Indian government never officially claims a victory on that skirmish in 1967. 6park.comThus, basically, if your own government doesn’t regard it as a victory, what is the claim based on? 6park.comIndian netizen edited Wikipedia term of 67 skirmish in their own wish. Just look at the references below the term. You’ll understand. 6park.comThe truth is Indian officials in 9/16 asked PLA to return 14 bodies, 24 captured guns and other stuff. 6park.comI don’t know where they get the number— “340 casualties”. 6park.comIf their claim is right, PLA attacked into Sikkim, failed and retreated, leaving 340 bodies. 6park.comThen, 6park.comAny photos? 6park.comAny Proof? 6park.comIf not having bodies, photos or official records of weapons captured will be alright. 6park.comAlso,what can China obtain by attacking Sikkim? 6park.comOk, even if I assume your assumption that China was a badass and wanted to occupy Sikkim is “right”, 6park.comthen, why only sent 400 men to conquer a country? 6park.comPeace. 6park.com[EDIT.1] In my comment area, Mr.Nayak said: “Do you have proof? Photos.. anything apart from a farce written by some PLA douche on their official website!” 6park.comOk, Mr.Nayak. Before pointing others’ claim is baseless, why not watch some old books first? 6park.comI recommend an old book— “India China Border Dispute”, written by M.L.Sali, to you. 6park.comNote: M.L.Sali is an Indian. Though some descriptions like who attacked first are different from Chinese Source, still, my humble opinion is that its quality of content is much better than the wikipedia term. 6park.comAt least, it doesn’t “create” some number(340 casualties) with no support of reliable references. 6park.comAnd in another book— “China's Shadow Over Sikkim: The Politics of Intimidation” , written by G. S. Bajpai: 6park.comThus, it seems PLA did deliver dead bodies to Indian side. 6park.comAt least, PLA didn’t forge that part of the record. 6park.comSo, Mr.Nayak, what’s your opinion now? 6park.comThe key controversy is: 6park.comAccording to PLA’s source, it is “ PLA kept in place and did not chase Indian army.” 6park.comAccording to the records of M.L.Saili, it is: 6park.comClearly, even the author didn’t think China’s intention is to occupy Sikkim’s land at that time. 6park.comFinally, again, that answer’s aim is to provide the information from the other side so people can know things more comprehensively, not just from one side. 6park.comhttps://www.quora.com/Did-India-defeat-China-in-1967?q=1967%20indan
请点这里投票，“赞”助支持！