闫丽梦博士等两篇文章只有一个有效结论:病毒可制造。但这不是什么新发现
闫丽梦等两篇文章只有一个结论是有效的:病毒可人工制造。其余结论部分证据不足, 仅基于推理。 6park.com闫丽梦等第一篇新冠病毒文章摘要, 2020-09-15: 6park.com(1) 一份很好的SARS-CoV-2基础研究文献综述,内容科学性强。 6park.com(2) 文章内容支持其一个结论:SARS-CoV-2可以人工合成或改造 (YAN, et al_"Suggesting Sophisticated Laboratory Modification" )。 6park.com(3) 文章另一个结论与中国实验室有关,但是证据比较弱, 能看到的唯一证据是E-结构蛋白在SARS-CoV-2与CoV-ZC45之间的相似性。 CoV-ZC45是中国第一个发现并报道的。 6park.com(4)文章内容不能排除SARS-CoV-2自然进化的可能性。 6park.com闫丽梦等第二篇新冠病毒文章摘要, 2020-10-10: 6park.com1) RaTG13 有多个异常特征。从逻辑上讲,RaTG13 和 RmYN02 之间,至少有一个必须是人工的。然而,在这里,我们确信这两种病毒都是人造的。RaTG13 have multiple abnormal features. Logically, between RaTG13 and RmYN02, at least one must be artificial. Here, however, we are convinced that both viruses are artificial. 6park.com2)具体来说,作者认为RaBtCoV/4991病毒确实是RaTG13,是2012年引起矿工肺炎的病毒。因此,在MP789 RBM和SARSCoV-2之间观察到极高的syn/non-syn比(24:1) RBM 表明这两种病毒中至少有一种是人造的。 Specifically, authors believe that theRaBtCoV/4991 virus was indeed RaTG13 and was the virus causing pneumonia in the miners in 2012. Therefore, the extremely high syn/non-syn ratio (24:1) observed between MP789 RBM and SARSCoV-2 RBM indicates that at least one of the two viruses is artificia 3)报道的穿山甲冠状病毒序列编码的RBD不能有效结合pACE2。 The RBD encoded by the reported sequence of pangolin coronaviruses could not bind pACE2 efficiently. 6park.com4)我们认为这两种情况(RaTG13和穿山甲冠状病毒)中的序列制造很可能是由同一个人或同一团体进行的,他们对spike基因进化的误解在多次此类实践中持续存在,并导致syn的不自然外观/non-syn 曲线和数字。 we believe that the sequence fabrications in both cases (RaTG13 and pangolin coronaviruses) were most likely carried out by the same person or group, whose misconception of the spike gene evolution persisted in multiple such practices and resulted in the unnatural look of the syn/non-syn curves and numbers . 6park.com5) 所有制造的冠状病毒在 E 蛋白上与 ZC45 和 ZXC21 具有 100% 的氨基酸序列同一性(这是 Report-1 结论-评论) All fabricated coronaviruses share a 100% amino acid sequence identity on the E protein with ZC45 and ZXC21 (this is the Report-1 conclusion -comment) 6park.com
|